There has been much in the press recently about original brand owners fighting the supermarket giants for what it considers a "trademark infringement". The recent court ruling of the Thatcher's (cider) vs. Aldi case, in favour of the original brand, is likely to have a significant impact on future food and drink lookalikes.
This isn't a new phenomenon. The consumer group Which? in 2013 found some 150 products in similar packaging and revealed that, of the 2000+ people surveyed, 20% reported buying a copy by mistake instead of the brand.
An article in the Sun, back in 2017, quoted that the "lookalike product is mistaken for the brand in 20% of cases when both are present on shelves". This apparently increased to 64% when only the copycat version was present.
We are curious what this means for existing lookalikes that we have been used to seeing on our shelves for many years. We suspect it would be too late for those who have already had another business take unfair advantage of their established trademark to make a claim.
For future marketing and creative departments, it's now time to be original and find alternative ways to appeal to the consumer as to why we should change brands.
What are your thoughts?
https://cdn.sourceflow.co.uk/pfyh6hw8xpsu6015n93vrnbfmvur
Use this form to send us a message, and we'll get back to you shortly.
Business Operations Manager
Fiona McDonald is an experienced recruitment professional with a degree in Hospitality Management. With more than 25 years' recruitment industry experience, having worked across temporary and permanent agency recruitment, in-house and executive search, she has supported businesses and senior professionals across Food & Drink Manufacturing recruitment, Engineering, HVAC, Fire & Security, Commercial and Hospitality.
Explore our latest market insights on all things food and drink manufacturing.
Recruiting for a food production site isn’t the same thing as recruiting for an office, warehouse, or retail team; the hours, compliance requirements, and margin for error are completely differen. For example, a single gap in your rota can stop a line, and the wrong recruitment can have a direct, measurable impact. In this blog, we will cover what actually makes food production recruitment different, and why you need a specialist agency over a generalist.
Packaging used to be somebody else's decision. Marketing wanted shelf stand-out, NPD wanted the barrier properties, procurement wanted the price. Technical checked the declarations, signed it off and moved on to the next thing. That's over. Your packaging specification now carries a per-tonne cost; the size of that cost depends on how recyclable the pack is, and the person who has to evidence the classification works in your technical team.
The new robotic palletiser gets signed off in February and runs beautifully until a Sunday night in May, when it throws a fault nobody on site has seen before. Your shift engineer works through the obvious checks. The OEM's helpline opens at nine on Monday. Two lines are backed up until then, and there's a delivery vehicle booked for six in the morning. That's the gap between bringing in automation and being able to run it. It's also the reason a lot of food manufacturers are getting less out of their capital spend than the business case promised.