The Future of Copycat Products on our Shelves
There has been much in the press recently about original brand owners fighting the supermarket giants for what it considers a "trademark infringement". The recent court ruling of the Thatcher's (cider) vs. Aldi case, in favour of the original brand, is likely to have a significant impact on future food and drink lookalikes.
This isn't a new phenomenon. The consumer group Which? in 2013 found some 150 products in similar packaging and revealed that, of the 2000+ people surveyed, 20% reported buying a copy by mistake instead of the brand.
An article in the Sun, back in 2017, quoted that the "lookalike product is mistaken for the brand in 20% of cases when both are present on shelves". This apparently increased to 64% when only the copycat version was present.
We are curious what this means for existing lookalikes that we have been used to seeing on our shelves for many years. We suspect it would be too late for those who have already had another business take unfair advantage of their established trademark to make a claim.
For future marketing and creative departments, it's now time to be original and find alternative ways to appeal to the consumer as to why we should change brands.
What are your thoughts?
https://cdn.sourceflow.co.uk/pfyh6hw8xpsu6015n93vrnbfmvur
Reach out to us.
Get in touch with us.
Use this form to send us a message, and we'll get back to you shortly.
Fiona McDonald
Business Operations Manager
Fiona McDonald is an experienced recruitment professional with a degree in Hospitality Management. With more than 25 years' recruitment industry experience, having worked across temporary and permanent agency recruitment, in-house and executive search, she has supported businesses and senior professionals across Food & Drink Manufacturing recruitment, Engineering, HVAC, Fire & Security, Commercial and Hospitality.
Latest Insights
Explore our latest market insights on all things food and drink manufacturing.
How specialist recruiters reduce downtime across critical site leads and technical roles
Your Engineering Manager resigns on a Friday afternoon. By Monday you've briefed three agencies. By Wednesday you're looking at twenty-two CVs, and eighteen of them have never set foot in a food environment. You've now lost most of a week and you're no closer to filling the role. The line is still running, the planned maintenance schedule is already slipping, and your Operations Manager has picked up a second job on top of their own. This is the point where the difference between a generalist agency and a specialist recruiter stops being a procurement preference and starts costing you output.
The true cost of a bad hire and why Food Manufacturers are struggling to hire middle-management roles
A new Shift Manager starts in March. By June the pattern is clear. Changeovers are taking longer than they used to, the paperwork lands late more often than not, and two of your stronger line leaders have started asking about roles at the site down the road. Nobody has done anything obviously wrong. The operation is just running worse than it was. That's what a bad hire in middle management usually looks like. It rarely announces itself, and it almost never shows up as a single event you can point at. It gets worse over time, and by the time you've named the problem you've lost six months.
When to Hire Permanent vs. Interim in Food Manufacturing
Your Technical Manager hands in their notice on a Monday morning. There's a BRCGS audit eight weeks out, a customer visit before that, and a quality management system only one person on site properly understands. By Monday afternoon, you're already behind. Production has its own version. A shift manager goes off sick with no return date. A supervisor steps up to cover, and three weeks later that supervisor is taking calls from an agency, because the extra responsibility arrived without the extra money. Both situations force the same decision. Do you run a permanent search and live with the gap, bring in an interim, or do both at once?
How specialist recruiters reduce downtime across critical site leads and technical roles
Your Engineering Manager resigns on a Friday afternoon. By Monday you've briefed three agencies. By Wednesday you're looking at twenty-two CVs, and eighteen of them have never set foot in a food environment. You've now lost most of a week and you're no closer to filling the role. The line is still running, the planned maintenance schedule is already slipping, and your Operations Manager has picked up a second job on top of their own. This is the point where the difference between a generalist agency and a specialist recruiter stops being a procurement preference and starts costing you output.
The true cost of a bad hire and why Food Manufacturers are struggling to hire middle-management roles
A new Shift Manager starts in March. By June the pattern is clear. Changeovers are taking longer than they used to, the paperwork lands late more often than not, and two of your stronger line leaders have started asking about roles at the site down the road. Nobody has done anything obviously wrong. The operation is just running worse than it was. That's what a bad hire in middle management usually looks like. It rarely announces itself, and it almost never shows up as a single event you can point at. It gets worse over time, and by the time you've named the problem you've lost six months.
When to Hire Permanent vs. Interim in Food Manufacturing
Your Technical Manager hands in their notice on a Monday morning. There's a BRCGS audit eight weeks out, a customer visit before that, and a quality management system only one person on site properly understands. By Monday afternoon, you're already behind. Production has its own version. A shift manager goes off sick with no return date. A supervisor steps up to cover, and three weeks later that supervisor is taking calls from an agency, because the extra responsibility arrived without the extra money. Both situations force the same decision. Do you run a permanent search and live with the gap, bring in an interim, or do both at once?
info@truenorthtalent.co.uk
0161 399 1575
100 Embankment,
Cathedral Approach,
Manchester,
M3 7FB
Company Registration: 14987603
VAT Number: 449301888
