There’s many reasons interims can be a cost effective solution. Here’s just a few:
💷No pension, holiday pay, sick pay, benefits, company car, NI etc
⌛ No long term commitment. Expertise without the burden of ongoing employment costs.
💼 Time is money, the onboarding process for onboarding a permanent employee can be time consuming and expensive. Interim professionals with their wealth of experience, require minimal onboarding.
🏢 Often brought in to address specific challenges or spearhead projects. You’re paying for the expertise and results without having to take someone away from their day to day.
👷♂️ Scale your workforce up or down as needed, therefore not overcommitting to resource during slower periods and wasting money.
We could go on…
Investing in the right interim not only saves costs, but often proves to be a strategic investment that pays dividends over time.
A strong interim won’t just be there to fill a role, but leave lasting results that contribute to your bottom line. Not only meeting your immediate needs, but in the long run, paying for themselves.
Get in touch with Amy for more information on 07564 576300 📱
https://cdn.sourceflow.co.uk/pqmwfnlwjtzbyeq75wa30e64xdzq
Use this form to send us a message, and we'll get back to you shortly.
Managing Director
Amy Griffith is Managing Director of True North Talent and a leading specialist in Food and Drink Manufacturing recruitment, with 8 years’ experience in permanent and interim hiring, executive search and talent strategy, supporting organisations and senior leaders across the UK food, drink and manufacturing sectors.
Explore our latest market insights on all things food and drink manufacturing.
Your Engineering Manager resigns on a Friday afternoon. By Monday you've briefed three agencies. By Wednesday you're looking at twenty-two CVs, and eighteen of them have never set foot in a food environment. You've now lost most of a week and you're no closer to filling the role. The line is still running, the planned maintenance schedule is already slipping, and your Operations Manager has picked up a second job on top of their own. This is the point where the difference between a generalist agency and a specialist recruiter stops being a procurement preference and starts costing you output.
A new Shift Manager starts in March. By June the pattern is clear. Changeovers are taking longer than they used to, the paperwork lands late more often than not, and two of your stronger line leaders have started asking about roles at the site down the road. Nobody has done anything obviously wrong. The operation is just running worse than it was. That's what a bad hire in middle management usually looks like. It rarely announces itself, and it almost never shows up as a single event you can point at. It gets worse over time, and by the time you've named the problem you've lost six months.
Your Technical Manager hands in their notice on a Monday morning. There's a BRCGS audit eight weeks out, a customer visit before that, and a quality management system only one person on site properly understands. By Monday afternoon, you're already behind. Production has its own version. A shift manager goes off sick with no return date. A supervisor steps up to cover, and three weeks later that supervisor is taking calls from an agency, because the extra responsibility arrived without the extra money. Both situations force the same decision. Do you run a permanent search and live with the gap, bring in an interim, or do both at once?